Subject	it is a surprising shot to see so much wasted rotor space (n/m)
Posted by	LJZTT on November 14, 2010 at 6:46 AM
	This message has been viewed 30 times.
In Reply To	Perhaps, but I am not impressed. posted by Cuis-Z on November 14, 2010 at 06:26 AM
Message
Follow Ups	new rear stoptech BBK - sawbonez 17:35:01 11/13/10 Where are the brake pads? (n/m) - Cuis-Z 17:45:30 11/13/10 between the caliper pistons and the rotor (n/m) - sawbonez 17:52:01 11/13/10 well played (n/m) - zgene4 18:07:58 11/13/10 Well if it's there then it seems you aren't getting... - Cuis-Z 21:55:41 11/13/10 Yes. Pad/rotor contact surface area is only one factor - zgene4 22:08:54 11/13/10 Perhaps, but I am not impressed. - Cuis-Z 06:26:35 11/14/10 it is a surprising shot to see so much wasted rotor space (n/m) - LJZTT 06:46:34 11/14/10 me too, at the front, where a majority - zgene4 09:21:00 11/14/10 Pads were not installed in that picture, once installed - Coz@CZP 13:49:46 11/15/10 planning on running the same compound front and rear? (n/m) - zgene4 18:08:34 11/13/10 yep, i've been very pleased with performance friction - sawbonez 19:09:38 11/13/10 E-brake still? (n/m) - scoops 18:11:11 11/13/10 yes (n/m) - sawbonez 19:10:04 11/13/10 Very nice. (n/m) - Tu 18:32:02 11/13/10 Good choice. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 19:28:13 11/13/10 excellent (n/m) - LJZTT 19:55:22 11/13/10 where did you buy those RPF-1's with those offsets? (n/m) - vorpalZ 13:29:01 11/14/10 Luke at tire rack (n/m) - sawbonez 15:56:50 11/14/10 thanks (n/m) - vorpalZ 18:06:16 11/14/10
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.